Tape is dead. Almost.
Tape is dead. Almost.
I recently came across an article that advocated tape based backup and I felt the need to respond to the blog post with one of my own. To be quite honest, I was surprised while reading this. Tape is dying, and it’s not just me saying so. Heck, most data stored on tapes can’t even be recovered in the event of a disaster, and don’t even get me started on the security risk that tapes pose to businesses. In fact, Gartner recently reported in one of its articles that 71% of tape backups tend to fail when it comes down to restore. In my opinion, backing up to tape is no longer an acceptable risk for organizations to take.
Would you want your medical records backed up to tape only to find that after a disaster and subsequent restoration, only 29% was recoverable? I think not.
The mistake businesses make is that they only care about backup. Who cares about backup if you can’t restore your data? Backup is only done so that in the event that you end up losing data (if it hasn’t happened yet, it will), you can restore with confidence and get your business back on track as quickly as possible. All tape is, is a cheap way to get a cute little checkmark in your DR Plan.
Once upon a time, VHS movies, horse drawn wagons, and carrier pigeons were all considered trendy. Today its more about blue ray discs, hybrid/electric cars and “tweets”. Just something to ruminate about.
Thanks for reading. If you like what you’ve read, please leave me a comment. If you disagree, send your message via carrier pigeon ;-)



Come on! Where did this 71%
Come on!
Where did this 71% failure number come from?
Let's just pull numbers out of disk venders data sheets and PR sheets.
IF by any chance numbers as high as 71% were actually true tape would have killed itself. Instead LTO5 is out.
Do not get me wrong I do believe in disk storage and backups to disk, but I don't believe in a 75% failure rate. Show me a independence study for that number. NOT some study from EMC or NETAPP, or storage guys drinking the cool-aid.
Thanks for the reply,
Thanks for the reply, although I always get a chuckle someone makes a challenging point to a blog or article, but won't put their name behind it. Not everyone may agree with me, but I put my name to it. The statistic comes from a Gartner Report, check the link in the blog.
JW
Good one. So true. It’s a
Good one. So true. It’s a dreadful, high risk assumption that since your backup worked, so will your restore!!! Too few people test it before they NEED it.
John, I couldn't have said it
John, I couldn't have said it any better myself.
Check out this recent impact
Check out this recent impact on what the risks are of not securely handling your data.
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/351659/new_york_hospital_loses_d...
Great read. Organizations,
Great read.
Organizations, wake up! Your data needs to be properly protected!
If not tape what's the
If not tape what's the alternative?
Disk?!
Disk?!
Well said Jacob. Although
Well said Jacob. Although tape will be with us for a little while longer, it will disappear just like all antiquated technologies do. Backup to disk technology is finally sophisticated enough and inexpensive enough to eliminate tape forever.
Haha, shouldn't you be
Haha, shouldn't you be charging for that kind of knwoeglde?!
Thanks for the comment.
Thanks for the comment. Great website!